Interest through the Fulfillment of a Commandment

Question

If a person lends money to another on the condition that he allow him to use his etrog (a citrus fruit used in the Jewish festival of Sukkot) during the intermediate days of the festival, is there an issue of usury here, or do we say that commandments were not given for personal benefit?

Answer

Shalom!
It is forbidden to use a commandment as interest. Since it is apparent that the borrower is doing what he is doing because he received a loan. The prohibition of usury applies to everything, even something that does not have monetary value.

Source

Maimonides, Laws of Lending and Borrowing, Chapter 5, Law 12, forbade teaching the borrower Torah. And in the commentary “Mishneh LeMelech” there, he explained that the prohibition applies even though commandments were not given for personal benefit, since it is in exchange for the

Comments

Have an additional question on this topic or need clarification? Leave your comment below. (Please note that the comment will not be published but will be sent directly to the answering Rabbi for review and a private response)

Please sign up or log in to submit your comment

Become our partners in supporting and spreading the Torah. Help us answer more questions faster and better.
Next
More questions in this category
Workers rights
Contracting services
Trade and consumption
Monetary Laws and Charity