On the Dispute Between Rabbi and Rashbag Regarding Two Holding
This question and answer were automatically translated using our trained AI and have not yet been reviewed by a qualified rabbi. Please treat this translation with caution.
go to original →
Question
Regarding the dispute between Rabbi and Rashbag in Bava Metzia about two holding, can it be said, according to the words of Shita Mekubetzet in the name of the Rosh, that according to Rabbi, the lender is trusted if the document is not validated due to a migo that it is forged? Can it be said that this is a migo to extract, since it extracts from the borrower who until now had the document and was essentially the original owner (according to those who believe that the original owner is more significant than the holder). And the power of the document is that it can be used to collect the money, and therefore by the migo it extracts from the lender the document with which the lender can collect, and therefore this is a migo to extract, and this is exactly the dispute between Rabbi and Rashbag whether we say migo to extract or not. According to Rabbi - we say, according to Rashbag - we do not say. We would appreciate an answer if this can be said. Thank you!
Answer
Shalom and blessings
This site is intended for halachic questions.
For study-related questions, you can contact the Beit Hora'ah line at 0733260800, extension 10