Backing out of a deal without paying the deposit | Cancelling transactions | Ask the Rabbi - SHEILOT.COM

Backing out of a deal without paying the deposit

This question and answer were automatically translated using our trained AI and have not yet been reviewed by a qualified rabbi. Please treat this translation with caution.
Go to original →

Question

Shalom.

A woman who rents out evening dresses agreed with them on a set of four dresses, and she told them that she does not reserve the dresses until a deposit is paid. In practice they did not have the money and took her account details.
The renter relied on them having transferred the money and began making the required alterations, and after some time it turned out that they had made an arrangement with another rental place and also did not pay the deposit there. Are they obligated to pay her or not?

Answer

Shalom u’vracha.

Since the renters were told that she does not reserve the dresses before a deposit is paid, they likewise did not obligate themselves to pay as long as they had not paid the deposit. Her mistake in thinking that they had paid is a loss that she caused to herself.

Source

It should be explained that in renting dresses there are two separate transactions: rental of movable property (the dress itself) and hiring of workers (for the alterations). In the hiring of workers, the kinyan (formal acquisition of the obligation) takes effect through the beginning of the work: once the seamstress began to sew relying on what the renters told her, this would obligate them to pay. Regarding the rental of the dress itself, one must examine by which form of kinyan it can be acquired.
If there is a deposit, it takes effect as a kinyan kesef (even though money does not acquire movable property, the Shulchan Aruch in siman 198 states that in rental it does acquire, since the concern of “your wheat burned in the attic” does not apply). Seemingly, in this case, since the seamstress worked relying on the agreement she had with them, they should have to pay her for her work. Nevertheless, in practice they are exempt, because the two transactions were made together, and regarding both it was stated that the agreement would not be finalized until the deposit was paid. Therefore, the payment for the work, too, was not undertaken on the basis of the renters’ words, since from their perspective the agreement had not been concluded.

Comments

Have an additional question on this topic or need clarification? Leave your comment below. (Please note that the comment will not be published but will be sent directly to the answering Rabbi for review and a private response)

Please sign up or log in to submit your comment

Fulfill the Mitzvot of Purim

  • Machatzit HaShekel
  • Matanot La'Evyonim
  • Direct transfer on Purim day
Donate Now
All donations are distributed according to the guidance of our teacher, HaRav HaGaon Amram Fried, shlita